By Heather O.
Dear Jodi–
First, let me say that I like you. I really do. You’re one of the few authors that I feel actually does belong on the Best Seller’s List. Your writing is uncluttered, your stories are interesting, your characters compelling. But Jodi, I’ve got a bone to pick with you.
I recently picked up one of your novels in the airport, The Songs of the Humpback Whale. It’s an interesting little book with a complicated narrative structure. Not everybody can pull off something this gimmicky, so kudos to you for trying something tricky.
But is it too much to ask that if you’re writing about a cross country trip that you actually VISIT the places your characters go to? That is, if you’re going to describe them in detail, you might actually want to consider that there are people who are from the West who might realize that, um, wow, you have no idea what the heck you’re writing about.
Your characters, for example, head to the Grand Canyon. They are also supposed to go the “northernmost point” of the Canyon. Sorry, lady, but the Grand Canyon stretches East to West, and while it meanders northward, sort of, in some places, one would be hard pressed to find the “northernmost” point. It would require intensive and serious study of a topographic map, and since your character is map challenged, it’s a bit difficult to think she would have ever found such a place. Also, the North Rim of the Grand Canyon runs near the Kaibab Plateau and the Kaibab forest. If your characters are going from the Grand Canyon to Salt Lake, they would have certainly had to cross this forest, which is not, incidentally, dusty and barren, as you describe.
Which brings me to my biggest beef. When your characters get to Salt Lake City, you describe the city as “dwarfed” by the Mormon Church. Okay, fine, Mormons abound in Salt Lake. But you describe a different architecture, too. Um, sorry, but besides the temple, Salt Lake looks like most other modern cities. Also, nobody frolics in the Great Salt Lake, and certainly nobody has to slide down a “steep embankment” to get to the shore. And you can also be pretty certain that you’re not at the ocean because, well, yes there’s the salty smell, but there is also the small matter of the giant mountain range that frames the lake that sort of ruins the “at sea” illusion. The Great Salt Lake is essentially a big, flat, stinky, salty puddle in the middle of a valley. (And this is coming from a woman who loves the Great Salt Lake. Truly.)
All of this I could forgive, actually, if you hadn’t gotten the Mormons so wrong. And when I say so wrong, I mean SO WRONG. Your character passes out at a post office because she’s hot (although clothes don’t “stick” to you in Utah, fyi, unless you are exercising hard. Your sweat evaporates too quickly.). She’s brought to by a pediatric polygamist and his eldest nurse wife, who is one of three women attending to the main character. I suppose that you want to be considered edgy for making the polygamists smart, that you’re not buying into stereotypes, or was it that you supposed with a state full of polygamists, SOME of them had to be educated?
I’m here to tell you, however, that you are far less likely to run into polygamists in a downtown SLC post office than you are to dive like an otter in the Great Salt Lake. I’ve spent half my life in Salt Lake City, and never once ran into a polygamist.
Mormons don’t practice polygamy. If you do, you get excommunicated. There are people who do practice polygamy, but they are not mainstream mormons. They are not mainstream anything, as far as I know. The only time I came into contact with polygamists was when I was working at a diner at the foot of the aforementioned Kaibab Plateau, which leads me to believe that most polygamy communities are found in the southernmost parts of Utah and northern Arizona.
Perhaps you should look for them at the northernmost point of the Grand Canyon?
I don’t mean to be snide. Okay, maybe I do, but that’s just because in the middle of your very interesting and engrossing book I was smacked in the face with an awful and awfully inaccurate portrayal of, for lack of a better word, my people. It makes me wonder what else you’ve gotten wrong, and if this book indeed is worth my time.
Your research into humpback whales I’m sure is impeccable, and, as a BU graduate, I recognized the Massachusetts apple farm you’ve woven into the story from your accurate description of it. So I’m assuming research is a serious and careful part of your storybuilding.
I just wish your research had stretched past the original 13 colonies, and that you could see that, despite what Cantabridgians believe, the world does not revolve around New England.
Sincerely yours,
A Mormon fan who’d like you to know that we’re not all freaks.




Thank you. I hope you actually send that to her. Very nicely written!!
Comment #1 by MarianDecember 28th, 2009 at 2:24 pmWow! This really surprises me. You’re more of a Picoult reader than I, but I thought she was billed as “researcher extraordinaire?” One of her books she spent, like, a month in a death row prison?
But you’ve stumped me on Cantabridgians. We must not have those in AR.
Comment #2 by Melissa McDecember 28th, 2009 at 2:30 pmyou should totally send that in.
Comment #3 by amylouwhoDecember 28th, 2009 at 2:32 pmA Cantabridgian is someone who went to Cambridge University (in England) and in this country it is someone who went to university in Cambridge, MA, meaning that they went to Harvard.
Comment #4 by Nancy R.December 28th, 2009 at 2:36 pmMelissa-
I know, right? Her stuff in this book about Humpback whales is extraordinary, which is why it’s especially pathetic that she gets Mormons wrong. It is extremely obvious that she learned only the very basic details of Mormonism, and then put them in her book. Her geography about Salt Lake is laughable too, but like I said, I could forgive that she assumes the Salt Flats are anywhere near a post office if she wasn’t so off about everything else.
Comment #5 by Heather O.December 28th, 2009 at 3:06 pmHonestly, you should send it to her. She probably has a blog with an email address.
Comment #6 by janeDecember 28th, 2009 at 3:27 pmGood for you!!! I’m impressed with this letter. Go for it, send it to her!
Comment #7 by Jill ShelleyDecember 28th, 2009 at 3:34 pmThis made me laugh. I REALLY REALLY hope her agent, at the very least, gets to read this even if it doesn’t make it all the way to Jodi’s personal desktop. Great job Heather O.
Comment #8 by AmyDecember 28th, 2009 at 3:54 pmThis was published in 2001. Somebody’s probably pointed it out to her several times. Still, no harm in doing it again.
Comment #9 by The WizDecember 28th, 2009 at 4:32 pmNothing takes me out of a story faster than glaringly obvious stuff like that.
Comment #10 by SueDecember 28th, 2009 at 4:57 pmHehehehe. Mostly her books stress me out anyhow, so I don’t read them, but her writing doesn’t make me want to gag, like lots does. I guess we ought to write about what we know. Because SOMEBODY is sure to know it, if we don’t.
I just finished Up In the Air (there is George Clooney movie with same name out now that I shan’t see) and there were all sorts of little digs at Mormons. Like, you tell the author had some personal beefs/issues. But none of it struck me as glaringly inaccurate, so I guess there’s that!
Comment #11 by beeswaxDecember 28th, 2009 at 4:57 pmI know there are polygamists somewhere out Lehi (Eagle Mountain?) way because my friend’s dental practice is made up of a lot of the women and children. And when my parents and I were at dinner in Provo we walked by a rather large table of wives with their husband.
But you know, now that I think about it, I’ve don’t remember ever seeing any polygamists in SLC either. And Reed and I have been thinking about this for an hour now, lol.
Comment #12 by Tammy and ParkerDecember 28th, 2009 at 5:57 pmCrap. I love her books and the research she puts into them. I haven’t read this one, but dang, knowing this will turn me off a bit from anything else I read–I’ll always wonder if she just guessed at this piece of research or that one.
I swear, when it comes to Utah and Mormons, most writers just assume they know–and they NEVER get it right.
Comment #13 by AnnetteDecember 28th, 2009 at 6:08 pmAnnette-
I like her books, too. And this little bit really turned me off, too, which is a shame. I really do think she’s a solid novelist, and her books are thoughtful, engaging, and fairly clean. Perhaps she just skimped on this part because it’s not a major part of the story. And it’s not a major part of the story–not really, but her brother guides her through her journey from California to Massachusetts, specifically telling her that she is to go places he thinks she needs to go. So I found myself thinking, “Which part does she need—a brush with polygamists, or a dip in the lake that nobody ever ever swims in?” It was disconcerting, to say the least.
Wiz, the copyright is actually 1992, so indeed there has been time for the mistakes to have been pointed out. It’s also her first novel, so maybe I should cut her some slack.
Comment #14 by Heather O.December 28th, 2009 at 6:19 pmI was going to point out it was her first novel, but Heather O. beat me to it.
I like most of her books, but I disliked this book for reasons that had nothing to do with meeting the polygamists in the post office. I can’t share the reasons without major plot spoilers, though, so I shall resist the temptation.
I guess this is the reason she puts most of her books in New England, since she’s familiar with that area. I don’t expect impeccable research from a novelist, especially on an issue as minor as a short scene. It would have been nice if she’d known that polygamists don’t walk around identifying themselves to complete strangers, but it wasn’t that big of a deal to me.
Comment #15 by Molly in the Jello BeltDecember 28th, 2009 at 6:48 pmMolly–
You’re right in that it is a small, short scene. She doesn’t dwell on it. But when I come across some gross error of research (or lack thereof), it turns me off. It turned me off in the Twilight books (it was more than painfully obvious that Stephanie Meyer has never been to Port Angeles, and I knew that even though I’ve only spent one afternoon there), and I stopped reading the book ‘Salt’ altogether when the author made completely inaccurate statements about the Utah economy. As a reader, I just think, Well, if they got this wrong, what else is wrong?
The other side of this is the excitement of recognition when people get it RIGHT. I loved reading the description of the streets of Boston in another one of Picoult’s books, because I recognized them all. She writes about a diner on a street, and since I knew the street pretty well and didn’t recognize the diner, I figured she’d made it up for the sake of the story. (And maybe it’s there, and I just don’t know about it.) To me, making up stuff that isn’t there within the context of an accurately described street in a real city like Boston is perfectly acceptable in a fiction novel. To inaccurately describe a real place (and, in this case, a real religion) is annoying and sloppy.
Comment #16 by Heather O.December 28th, 2009 at 7:30 pmHere’s her email address, if you’re so inclined to actually send this letter to her: jodi@jodipicoult.com
My beef is TV shows or movies that mispronounce locations.
Comment #17 by JanelleDecember 28th, 2009 at 8:23 pmMY GRANDPARENTS USE TO FROLIC IN THE gREAT sALT lAKE. i HAVE PICTURES. BUT I DON’ THINK EVERYBODY DID.
Comment #18 by BrendaDecember 28th, 2009 at 8:51 pmThere is no point in frolicking in the great salt lake any more because you can’t float any more.
I really like Jodi Piccoult, although I think she could use a few other words once in a while instead of one that begins with F. And once in a while a happy ending would be great.
My favorite was The Tenth Circle.
I really did not care for Humpback Whales.
Comment #19 by Lindsay1138December 28th, 2009 at 9:23 pmPost it as a review on Amazon. Then lots of people will see it!
Comment #20 by momof8December 28th, 2009 at 9:27 pmMy grandparents used to frolic in the Great Salt Lake, too—in the 1920s. In 1992, when this book was published, I learned to sail on the Great Salt Lake with my future husband. Nobody, and I mean nobody, was swimming in it then. Yuck.
Comment #21 by Heather O.December 28th, 2009 at 9:58 pmMaybe since this was her first book she learned quite a bit about doing research? I’ve quit reading her because it almost seems to me that her latest books are the same theme as the first ones & that they are very rushed. *shrug* Oh well, to each her own.
Comment #22 by Sues2u2December 28th, 2009 at 11:15 pmWhy can’t you float in it anymore? Has the salinity gone down?
Comment #23 by Tracy MDecember 29th, 2009 at 1:30 amI think you can probably still float in the northern half (though no one bothers to drive there), but yes, the salinity has gone down. The railroad causeway in it has basically cut the lake in two, and since there are more inlets from rivers in the southern half and they don’t mix anymore, it’s not nearly as salty as it used to be. Both halves are still saltier than the ocean, though.
Comment #24 by FirebyrdDecember 29th, 2009 at 2:08 amI love this letter on so many levels–the Mormon side of it, and the calling out of New Englanders on their complete lack on knowledge when it comes to the rest (read majority) of the country.
We read one of her books for our ward (but not RS sanctioned) book club and invited her to our meeting that month, since we live not far from her. She actually responded to the email, saying that she’d love to attend, but had to be out of town that week. And, if we ever read her again to let her know in advance so she could schedule it in. So, she’s seems pretty open and reachable….she might actually appreciate the feedback in this letter.
Comment #25 by cabeshDecember 29th, 2009 at 7:09 amI love Jodi Picoult! But this is a book that I didn’t even know had Mormon’s in it because I have never made it past the 4th chapter, despite several tries. I just don’t care about whales that much.
Comment #26 by LisaCDecember 29th, 2009 at 11:46 am“And once in a while a happy ending would be great.”
I completely agree with this.
Comment #27 by Molly in the Jello BeltDecember 29th, 2009 at 8:19 pmYep, I’m done with Piccoult, but not because of this book. It’s all do-overs now. I understand publishing pressures but I don’t have to buy it. Thanks for the warning about this one.
You know, there is something nice about the 13 colonies not knowing anything about the rest of the country - When you live in them they don’t have a clue what Mormons are, so no bad attitudes from neighbors or other ‘persecutions’. At least once they make sure there is only one wife.
Comment #28 by jendoopDecember 29th, 2009 at 9:56 pmThis doesn’t really add to the conversation, since it doesn’t give credence to other obvious faults in the story, but I grew up in Salt Lake, near Liberty Park, and I saw polygamists every week. On my same block, just down the street, there was a polygamous commune. I’m not making this up. There were at least 7 homes (I can’t be sure how many, exactly, they were enclosed), where a large family lived, their teenagers constantly out doing yardwork in overalls and 1960’s haircuts. Just sayin’.
Comment #29 by sarah k.December 30th, 2009 at 8:33 amAside about Up in the Air:
It was written by Walter Kirn, whose family was Mormon for a little while, and he has consistently plumbed that experience to help build his literary career.
Comment #30 by Wm MoDecember 30th, 2009 at 8:35 amThis is why I can’t read Lee Child any more. He did the same thing to a novel of his that was set in Wyoming.
Comment #31 by AbelDecember 30th, 2009 at 8:46 am.
Aaaargh! This is one of my pet peeves. It’s enough to keep me off Picoult permanently (not that I had actually started yet). I don’t anticipate reading any more Andy Greenwald either. In his case also (although he’s a New Yorker) there does seem to be a bit of cultural snobbishness at play.
Sigh.
Comment #32 by Th.December 30th, 2009 at 9:13 amYou CAN float in the Great Salt Lake. The only time you couldn’t was back in the ’80s when we had several wet year and the lake became “overfull”, covering the causeway to Antelope Island, covering farmland and flooding parts of Farmington. That was when Gov Bangerter built the infamous pumps out in the west desert that have never needed to be used since then.
Comment #33 by SylviaDecember 30th, 2009 at 12:58 pmSylvia, I don’t know about floating, but I sure as heck have never seen ANYBODY frolic like an otter. Would you want to put your head underwater in the Great Salt Lake? Hardly. Your body would be caked with itchy salt. And with the brine flies and the stink, it’s not exactly an ideal picnic spot.
Sarah k, I’m amazed about your polygamist experience. Truly. Thanks for sharing.
Comment #34 by Heather O.December 30th, 2009 at 1:59 pmbut even if you could swim in the great salt lake, would you WANT to? Yikes the flies and smell . . . shudder. I saw a video called the American Mormon that made me laugh. A guy went around interviewing random people on the street to find out what they knew about Mormons. HILARIOUS! Some guy said, “I think they churn their own butter.” And his friend said, “Naw, that’s the Amish.” Then the interviewer went to an Amish community and asked one of the men there, “Do you churn your own butter?” The man gave the interviewer a look that clearly read, “You’re an idiot.” As he replied that they did NOT churn their own butter. Misconceptions abound in every society in which you are not a part.
Comment #35 by julie wrightDecember 30th, 2009 at 7:36 pmHas anyone read “The Pact: A Love Story”? More like “A Gratuitous Graphic Sex Story”. Even though I LOVED “My Sisters Keeper”, her other books all seem to include lots of sex scenes most of which are totally unnecessary to the plot. The Pact, was by far the worst and has convinced me not to bother with any more of her books. I’m sick of having to “read around” the bad scenes to get back to the interesting plot. And seriously…the F word…it can be very powerful….until you use it a thousand times. Then it just gets REALLY OLD!!!!!
Comment #36 by EmilyJanuary 3rd, 2010 at 5:15 pmthanks to your ideas , i¡¯d adore to adhere to your weblog as usually as i can.possess a good day
Comment #37 by Quintin MarchionyJune 10th, 2010 at 3:25 pm