By Heather O.

Okay, I know it’s rated R. I went to it anyway, because I’m a speech therapist, stuttering is flippin’ hard to treat, Colin Firth and Geoffrey Rush are two of my favs, and I had some time to kill. (I was in Boston, getting a check up, alone, and I had 7 hours with nothing to do, and it was Feb. in New England. Like I said, time to kill.)
I highly recommend this movie, and I don’t care who you are, you are going to love it.
The reason it is rated R is because of the F bomb, and it’s said frequently. Except, it’s not said in any kind of linguistic context, it’s said as a part of Colin Firth’s, aka future King George, therapy. He says it because Geoffrey Rush, aka the King’s speech therapist, is trying to find ways of freeing up the king’s speech, and the king can say that word without stuttering. He says it over and over, but again, not in conversation or in anger, just as part of a speech exercise. And the way they stage it is pretty funny, and I laughed and laughed.
Does that make me callous? Maybe. Is it the proverbial poop in the chocolate chip cookie? I don’t think so, but I could be rationalizing. Did I enjoy every second of the movie? You bet your riding boots I did.
Everybody has different rules about rated R movies, and I respect people’s feelings about that. Our family doesn’t make a habit of watching rated R movies, and we stick to that pretty well. I do make occasional exceptions, however, like in the case of Schindler’s List and Saving Private Ryan, two movies that I think were worth it.
So if you feel strongly about rated R movies and don’t want to break your rule, I can fully understand. If, however, you are ever willing to make an exception, this is one movie that will leave you feeling uplifted, inspired, and happy, and, if you’re a speech therapist who dated a stutterer in high school, you might even shed a tear or two. You will leave with just a little bit more faith in humanity.
And even more in love with Mr. Darcy. ‘Cause Mr. Darcy also makes one kick-butt King.




Just move to Canada where it’s rated PG! I loved the movie too. Loved both Colin Firth and Geoffrey Rush - even though physically Colin Firth is nothing like King George VI who was short. As a little bonus - did you notice that the actress who played wife to Geoffrey Rush’s character played Elizabeth Bennett in Pride and Predjudice? It was driving me nuts because I couldn’t remember where I’d seen her before.
Comment #1 by RitaFebruary 12th, 2011 at 9:53 amI’m so proud of my husband who recognized Lizzy even before I did!
Comment #2 by jksFebruary 12th, 2011 at 10:07 amLoved the movie. I love anything old and English. I love history and England! Plus my son has a language disorder and expressing himself is difficult. I couldn’t not see this movie.
Rita, I couldn’t place her either, and actually sat through the credits to figure out who she was. When ‘Jennifer Ehle’ popped up, my jaw dropped. How could I have missed it?
And how awesome was Helena Bonham Carter? No sign of Bellatrix Lestrange anywhere!
Comment #3 by Heather O.February 12th, 2011 at 10:15 amCompared to the abundant smut and garbage in theatres, on the radio, and even on TV this movie was squeaky clean. I have heard the F bomb dropped casually on television, in derogatory and vulgar ways. This was neither of the above. I have not seen an R rated movie since 1993, but after careful consideration felt that this was a movie I wanted to see. (It was also recommended to me by several BYU professors) I left feeling inspired, uplifted, and thoroughly entertained. (And did you notice that Mr. Collins from P and P was also part of the cast?)
Comment #4 by ShelliFebruary 12th, 2011 at 10:32 amI loved the movie, thought it was great. Colin Firth’s performance was so impressive! I did sort-of date a guy who stuttered in HS, and it gave me flashbacks…
Comment #5 by dangermomFebruary 12th, 2011 at 10:34 amDid you ever see ‘A Room With a View’? Probably the first thing I’d seen Helena Bonham Carter in. I loved it - a lovely sweet movie set in Italy early last century. She got typecast for a while in those period type pieces. Think she rebelled!
Comment #6 by RitaFebruary 12th, 2011 at 11:00 amShelli, I did catch Mr. Collins, and of course, Dumbledore as well. The British acting world just isn’t that large, I guess.
I wonder why they didn’t pair Jennifer Ehle with Colin Firth again? Not that Helena Bonham Carter didn’t do an amazing job, I just wonder.
Comment #7 by Heather O.February 12th, 2011 at 11:12 amLOVED the movie.
Comment #8 by Melissa McFebruary 12th, 2011 at 11:18 amWould see it over and over again.
That probably would have been too distracting!
Comment #9 by RitaFebruary 12th, 2011 at 11:28 amI loved how HBC handled the role; I think she was much better suited to it. I did see Mr. Collins and the others–did anyone catch they guy who played Churchill? He’s been in a lot of things, but I always think of him as the guy in Red Dwarf who calls everyone a twonk.
Comment #10 by dangermomFebruary 12th, 2011 at 11:41 amThe solution is obvious. Anyone who has qualms about going to an R rated movie can simply take a quick trip to Canada and see it there.
Comment #11 by Mark B.February 12th, 2011 at 12:05 pmI am so mad, we were supposed to go see this yesterday afternoon and my mom (who was going with me) started having an anxiety attack (over something else) so we didn’t make it, and now it’s gone!! Perhaps it might show up at our $3 theater in another week or so… I hope!
I’m sure you’ve all heard of that Kids In Mind website? When they review a movie they have three catagories that receive a score from 0-10 depending on content. Sex/Nudity, Violence and Language. They go further still and tell you exactly what happens or is said to cause the score to have been received. I know my hubby who is uber-watchful about content thinks it’s the bees knees, but sometimes I wish he’d never have discovered it because I am missing some good movies!
Comment #12 by SallyGirlFebruary 12th, 2011 at 12:44 pmDangermom, I think the guy who played Churchhill also played wormtail in HP. I’ve been on the fence about seeing, maybe I’ll have to check it out next time I have a free Saturday.
Comment #13 by dorriFebruary 12th, 2011 at 1:22 pmI loved this movie so much I saw it two weekends in a row. As I told my husband, this is one R rated movie I would feel comfortable recommending to anybody. It was most definitely uplifting and inspiring, and the language was really there for a purpose instead of being gratuitous. Best movie I’ve seen in a LONG time.
Comment #14 by JenniferFebruary 12th, 2011 at 1:38 pmClearplay DVD players are nice for things like this–filters language.
Comment #15 by anitaFebruary 12th, 2011 at 3:19 pmI’m definitely going to have to see this, thanks to your review.
Comment #16 by ErinFebruary 12th, 2011 at 5:30 pmI think it’s funny that we often have to defend such choices like why we saw a particular rated R movie. Clearly not all rated R’s are created equal…there’s American Pie/Porky’s rated R, then there’s Schindler’s list rated R. Not that I’m saying it’s ridiculous you defended yourself, but I’m relating with you since I recently saw 127 Hours, which was also rated R and which I’d also recommend. Of course it’s rated R! The guy cuts off his own arm….and I’m pretty sure saying a few swear words during that ordeal isn’t going to put him on the naughty list for the eternities.
Comment #17 by MiggyFebruary 12th, 2011 at 6:39 pmI just read that the rating was contested, both here and in the UK. The UK downgraded it to 12A, which is our equivalent of PG-13. The U.S. obviously didn’t change it, but the fact that it was contested means that there was some wiggle room.
I wouldn’t even put this in the category of Schindler’s List (which I loved), because there is just nothing in this movie that’s even on the same emotional level. It’s a simple, quiet movie. Could they have filmed it without the F word? Probably. Does it distract from the quality of the film? Not at all.
Comment #18 by Heather O.February 12th, 2011 at 8:37 pmWe just saw it tonight and I thought of you the whole time — it made me want to understand better the therapies used to treat a stutter. I recommend it to anyone who has ever loved a speech therapist! I love two ST’s — you and my son’s — she’s the best.
Comment #19 by Andrea R.February 12th, 2011 at 10:17 pmAndrea, stuttering is a bear to treat. I haven’t done much of it, but had to treat a few cases in graduate school, and every patient is so different and so multi-faceted. The patient that I had actually quit therapy when his father died, because he was so emotionally shook up that he said he had to try another type of therapy. His stutter got a lot worse, too, which was disappointing for both of us. Unfortunately, there is no quick fix, and I like how the movie portrayed that multi-faceted approach–it’s not just about the muscle relaxation and mechanics (although those are important), it’s about the underlying emotional aspects of it too.
Comment #20 by Heather O.February 13th, 2011 at 7:53 amThe US rating system is silly…there are no set rules, despite the rumors of “if it has more than 1 F word its an automatic R” etc. Its a random group of people you don’t know, who have no rules or guidelines to base their rating on, and they can be overruled by the team captain, so really, whatever he thinks goes. They have no formal training or instruction, and politics and money and bribery have more to do with it than anything.
So while the rating does give you a jumping off point, it should NOT be the end all, be all decision making factor. I’ve seen PG-13 movies that are way worse than some Rated R, and almost all PG kid movies let awful things slip by nowadays.
I like to read the Parent Guidelines on imdb.com for a more detailed view of the movie to make my decision. Ratings have very little say in my end decision now.
Comment #21 by OliveFebruary 13th, 2011 at 1:42 pmLike other people have been saying the US rating system is silly, so I have also been consulting the Catholic Bishops Movie Reviews. http://www.usccb.org/movies/ They rate on moral content which I thought was a good idea.
Comment #22 by TeriFebruary 14th, 2011 at 2:45 amLoved The Kings Speech! My husband and I both had tears in our eyes through it. And I’m married to a stoic construction guy, so that is something. And I proudly took my teenage kid to see it, too. We both got over the R rating real quick.
Comment #23 by living in zionFebruary 14th, 2011 at 9:49 amAwesome job of being examples for the church. “We believe in honoring the commandments as long as we agree with them. If not, we don’t have to follow them.”
Comment #24 by CamilleFebruary 14th, 2011 at 10:20 amCamille-
Here’s the thing. While I appreciate your sentiment, my question to you is, why is there a recommendation (sorry sister, it ain’t a commandment) to avoid rated R movies? This isn’t a sarcastic question, I would actually love to have a discussion about it.
My thought is that because 99% of the time, watching a rated R movie takes away from the Spirit, or makes it more difficult to feel the Spirit. If your media diet consists of things that are negative, or portray things that we hold sacred to be silly or outdated (premarital sex is okay, family values are bunk, murder, etc, etc), it erodes your spirituality and ultimately has a negative impact on our relationship with others and our Savior. Thus, we use the rating system as a guide to help us make good choices about our entertainment.
So while you think I am being a bad example of the church (and you have that right), I actually disagree with you, only because this is not a time when I am saying, “Well, ignore the bad stuff because the rest of it is uplifting” I’m saying ALL of the stuff is uplifting, even the bad stuff, because of the context. In my opinion, watching this movie is a good entertainment choice. I’m just trying to convey information about a movie which, in my opinion, is EXACTLY the kind of movie Latter-day Saints should be watching–clean, uplifting, inspiring, simple, quiet, fun.
The F word is said, yes. But I’ll tell you that I would have done the same thing as a speech therapist if I thought it would help a stutterer in the long run. Stuttering is complicated and multi-faceted, and if you find something that works, you go with it.
Again, this is just my opinion, based on my personal experiences, professional training, and my own level of spirituality. I’m not trying to change anybody else’s opinion. Take it for what it’s worth.
Comment #25 by Heather O.February 14th, 2011 at 10:57 amWe don’t speak for the whole church and have never claimed to do so. I’m sorry if you’re offended.
Comment #26 by The WizFebruary 14th, 2011 at 11:07 amNo, the bad stuff is not uplifting. Are you telling me that by them using the f-word, you felt uplifted? There are hundreds of thousands of words in the English language. There isn’t any other word that they could have used?
“Satan uses such entertainment to deceive you by making what is wrong and evil look normal and exciting.” For the Strength of Youth, page 17.
“Profane, vulgar, or crude language or gestures…are offensive to the Lord and to others. Foul language harms your spirit and degrades you.” FTSOY, pg. 22.
You can try to justify it all you want, but I am offended when you are a Mormon site and then talk about how you don’t have to obey the commandments. By your very name you are setting an example of the church to people who read your blog. If you don’t want that responsibility, maybe you should change the name of your blog.
I am not setting myself up as perfect, but I am trying. And to me, that means to try my very best to avoid things that will pull me down. And yes, the f-word WILL pull you down, I don’t care what context it is used in.
Comment #27 by CamilleFebruary 14th, 2011 at 1:11 pm“There are hundreds of thousands of words in the English language. There isn’t any other word that they could have used?”
As a matter of fact, in this case, no. The entire point of the scene in which the f word is used is to get over a stutter. It takes the f word to help him do that. If there WAS another way to do it, the speech therapist would have done so. So no, it is about the power of the word. Specifically, that word. Sorry, you don’t have to believe me, but that’s the truth of it.
FWIW, I believe I covered the whole “degrading entertainment” with my previous comment. This is not degrading entertainment. This is the opposite of degrading entertainment. I’m not embarrassed or ashamed that I’m a mormon and watched this movie–this is the kind of movie I think mormons ought to be watching. This is much less spiritually degrading than True Grit (which I wouldn’t recommend, necessarily, even though I liked it–rated PG-13) or even Lord of The Rings, (which I loved but still wouldn’t recommend it for everyone), or even Prince Caspian (which was rated PG, a movie I took my son to, a movie that made me physically ill with the level of violence). There isn’t a person in this world I would feel uncomfortable watching this movie with.
(Well, except maybe you.)
Comment #28 by Heather O.February 14th, 2011 at 2:36 pmThanks for the review. This looked like a good one, and I’m glad to hear your candid thoughts. As for letter-of-the-law-ers, let us reiterate, there is no commandment dictating what movies we “can” or “cannot” see based on rating. I for one am glad to have the input of a thinking person with similar values.
Comment #29 by BeckyFebruary 14th, 2011 at 2:39 pmOne more thought—
I guess what I’m trying to say is that I don’t disagree with you, Camille, when you talk about the dangers of media and entertainment. I think the R rating is a good guide, and movies with that rating should be avoided. I also agree that there are very, VERY few exceptions to this rule.
The King’s Speech is one of the exceptions. That’s really all I’m saying.
Comment #30 by Heather O.February 14th, 2011 at 2:52 pmCamille, Camille, Camille. There are many, many inspiring, uplifting, lovely, and praiseworthy R-rated films. I know you won’t believe me and that’s okay but it’s true.
And, yes, I have heard the f-word, in context, be uplifting. Heather O. is right, this is a terrific film and worth your hard-earned pesos.
Comment #31 by LupitaFebruary 14th, 2011 at 4:52 pmIt sounds like a fantastic movie. I’m adding it to my list of films to watch. Thanks for the thorough review.
Comment #32 by kaduseyFebruary 14th, 2011 at 6:58 pmMy husband and I saw this film for Valentine’s day. I appreciated the fact that is captured supportive, healthy, functioning, and loving marriage - a feat that is rarely depicted or appreciated in today’s entertainment and media. It’s a story of a man overcoming a weakness, discovering the power he has within himself, a story that any Latter-day Saint can relate too.
I reread the section on entertainment and media in the “For the Strength of Youth” pamphlet because I was curious about what it said about movie ratings. It doesn’t say anything specific ratings but the first few lines instruct us to choose entertainment that will “help you to have good thoughts and make righteous choices”. My thoughts after this movie were only good and it encouraged me to continue to fight to overcome weaknesses I may have.
Comment #33 by bethFebruary 15th, 2011 at 12:38 amIf ever there was a movie that warps the meaning of both the MPAA ratings and the FSY guidelines, it’s The King’s Speech. Forget everything you know about the ‘R’ rating, at least just for this one movie, because it doesn’t apply.
Once I got beyond my delight with the spot-on performances by the actors, I realized that most of the movie was about pretty dull stuff (let’s make a movie about speech therapy and family life!), but there isn’t a dull moment ever in this movie. Or a wasted moment. Every actor/scene reveals something truthful and fascinating that advances the story, and while there is plenty of marginal behavior and Looming Evil, the good in the movie triumphs in a natural, believable and satisfying way. The overall effect is profoundly uplifting. If you just cannot take the very small but essential part of the movie that is the profanity, you’ll miss being a witness to that increasingly rare thing: a movie in the theaters that is edifying in every way that a movie can be. And not harmful in the least.
And no, I wasn’t pulled down by the profanity, and I wasn’t hurt in any way by it. I can hardly even remember it. I have heard worse that does pull you down, so I know the difference. I raised teenagers. I live in America in 2011.
I’m particularly glad that I sent the movie industry the message that was my purchased ticket.
Comment #34 by Mommie DearestFebruary 15th, 2011 at 2:38 amI haven’t yet seen this movie. I stuttered as a child. It’s exceedingly frustrating to be unable to communicate. I was blessed and had a mother who was patient and just calmly waited for me to finish. I didn’t get any formal therapy. I don’t have regular problems as an adult, but when I am nervous or stressed I have to really concentrate on my speech or I get tripped up. I have compensated with more precise than normal enunciation. Taking the time to enunciate has minutely slowed down the whole process which helps.
A side note: my son could not pronounce “tr” until after he turned 5 years old. He said the “f” sound instead. His favorite vehicles were trucks and talked about them constantly….. It went on for years. I’m sure that a lot of strangers thought I was teaching my son bad language.
Comment #35 by JCFebruary 16th, 2011 at 8:58 amJust wanted to add my voice to the “uplifting” side. I hadn’t seen a R-rated movie in YEARS. I felt very strongly about not seeing them, but after reading about it on the kids-in-mind website, I decided to see it. I am so happy that I did! It was a great movie and the language did not offend me at all. It was go great that I didn’t even feel bad recommending it to my parents and others. I have seen PG’s and PG-13 that were WAY worse. I loved it, and not afraid to stay it.
Comment #36 by JenFebruary 17th, 2011 at 9:26 amComment to those upset at Camille.
Was getting on the ark a commandment or “just a recommendation”?
Comment #37 by annonFebruary 17th, 2011 at 7:57 pmNobody’s upset with Camille. Her opinion was not mocked, just disagreed with, and backed up with the reasons why.
Comment #38 by Mommie DearestFebruary 18th, 2011 at 1:06 pmAgain, I am impressed with the thoughtfulness and civility of the people who post to this blog; Camille’s potentially divisive remarks were met with calm reasoning and kindness. I say bravo!
Comment #39 by NotAMormonFebruary 19th, 2011 at 12:48 pmMommie Dearest is right. Nobody is upset with Camille. I think I actually agreed with most of what she was saying. Most rated R movies aren’t appropriate, and should be avoided. I’m not saying we should all rush out and see rated R movies. I’m just saying we should watch THIS rated R movie
.
I loved the comment about the message we send to Hollywood by purchasing the ticket. This is worth the message.
annon–I don’t know if the ark was a commandment or a recommnendation. I wasn’t there.
Comment #40 by Heather O.February 20th, 2011 at 9:54 pmI will admit I am probably more liberal in my movie choices than some, but this is my *own* personal standard I have made that I am very comfortable with. I don’t even look at the rating. I try to find out about the content and context and make a judgment from there. Many R-rated (or 14A or PG13, I’m in Canada) are garbage. The violence, crude language, horror, sex, whatever, is gratuitous, unnecessary, and offensive- mostly because of the exceptionally low level of intelligence used to appreciate them. I won’t watch them because I have a finite amount of time in my life, and that would be two hours I will never get back. However, we do not live in a G-rated world, and I think it is incredibly important, not optional really, to understand and appreciate the good and the bad/sad/challenges of the world we live in. Was the violence in Saving Private Ryan or Band of Brothers horrific? Yes. Was it gratuitous? No. Someone lived through that so that I can have the life of freedom that I do, and I am grateful someone (okay, Steven Spielburg) gave me the opportunity to have their experience become more real to me. Do I feel incredibly motivated by the power of the human spirit after seeing The King’s Speech or 127 Hours? Absolutely. Does the degree of suffering portrayed in Hotel Rwanda or Schindler’s List make it inappropriate to acknowledge? Hardly. I had a roommate in university that went to see Schindler’s List and returned early- so offended by the nudity that she walked out. I couldn’t even speak, I was so floored. I am not judging her, or anyone else who feels that their sensitivities would be compromised, by watching Schindler’s List. But, living in the world but not of the world does not equate to a bubble of ignorant bliss, IMHO. No offense intended to anyone- stepping off my soapbox now
Comment #41 by mitsyFebruary 22nd, 2011 at 1:05 amStill reading the comments, but had to respond to this:
“And how awesome was Helena Bonham Carter?”
Best. Actor. Alive. End. Of. Discussion.
The creativity in that house (married to Tim Burton) must just bounce off the walls and ooze through the cracks in the walls (if there are any cracks in the walls).
Comment #42 by RayFebruary 22nd, 2011 at 4:13 pmI haven’t see the movie, but I’ve heard wonderful things about it - and, as my previous comment implies, I’d probably watch it just because Helena Bonham Carter has a prominent role in it.
As far as the R-rated issue goes, it’s been addressed by others very well, so I simply will add my “amen” to two things: 1) the rating system is really messed up; 2) there are some R-rated movies that truly are “virtuous, lovely, praiseworthy and of good report” after which we should seek; 3) there is NO “command” within Mormonism that forbids all members from watching any particular movie. Some things are obvious, but this example isn’t one of them. The principles are what’s important, and it sounds to me like “The King’s Speech” violates NONE of those principles.
Comment #43 by RayFebruary 22nd, 2011 at 4:43 pmRay, HBC does her role with a lovely subtlety. After seeing her as Bellatrix, I wouldn’t have thought her capable of subtle. She pulls it off splendidly.
Comment #44 by Heather O.February 22nd, 2011 at 9:26 pmI agree with Heather. She has many, many opportunities to ham it up and the scenery remains unchewed. I like to think it’s some sort of royal Queen Mum influence.
That movie continues to stay on my mind.
Comment #45 by Mommie DearestFebruary 22nd, 2011 at 11:14 pm