By Heather O.
I’m not gonna lie, 2012 was a hard year to be a Republican. It’s bad enough that we have to claim the likes of Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck. Throw in Todd Aiken’s “legitimate rape” comments, Anne Coulter calling the president a retard, and the entire Virginia state legislature’s ideas on decreasing abortion rates, and you get a whole boat load of facepalm worthy moments. Sometimes I would ask myself, “WHY am I affiliated with such bozos? This is embarrassing.”
But I remember the one day when I picked up one of Glenn Beck’s books in a bookstore, just to peruse. I have no love for Glenn Beck, for a variety of reasons, and was ready to read things I would quickly mock. To my utter shock, I found myself agreeing with almost everything I read. Mostly the stuff I was skimming was about government subsidies and free markets, so maybe there was more stuff in there that would make my blood boil. But I came home and told my husband, “I WAS AGREEING WITH GLENN BECK! What does this mean??!?” My husband grinned at me and said, “It means you’re a true Republican at heart, babe.”
So I’m a Republican. But this year, I felt like I spent a lot of time saying things like, “Yeah, that guy’s nuts, but not all of us are.” “Yeah, well, that’s kinda stupid, but Republicans have lots of good ideas”, and “Yeah, but…” and “Well, okay, but….”. And in the end, the country just didn’t buy it.
Along those same lines, I wonder these days if it’s hard to be a gun owner.
I know people who own guns. Most of them are pretty normal stable citizens who aren’t about to go shoot innocent 6 year olds, and when they talk about guns, I mostly sort of shrug. My family is not into guns. My husband’s family is not into guns. Despite having deep Western roots, my father doesn’t hunt, nor did his father. My FIL doesn’t hunt either, and while my husband’s grandfather, a bonafide cowboy from Price, Utah, might have had a gun or two, he didn’t pass on any kind of gun culture to my FIL, who would rather spend his afternoon in a museum looking at firearms than tote any.
Bottom line, I don’t identify with gun nuts. At all.
Right after the tragedy, I saw my friends who have guns go on the defensive. We’ve all heard the arguments: people kill people, not guns. Take away guns from law abiding citizens, and the bad guys will win! The only way to stop a bad guy with a gun is with a good guy with a gun.
And I guess those arguments are true. It’s my understanding that the Trolley Square shooting years ago was stopped by an undercover cop who happened to be shopping. I’ve seen statistics that suggest that armed citizens can reduce the number of overall gun violence in any particular area. I’ve read that the armed officers at Columbine didn’t help much with taking down the shooters, but at least they tried. Sometimes even the good guys are out numbered and outgunned.
But the other day, I pulled into the grocery store parking lot, listening to the radio. An ad came on for a gun show. The announcer was gleeful, listing off all the guns they had to offer. There was hard rock music pumping through the ad to ramp up the excitement. The ad ended with the announcer telling everybody to visit the website, something like “gunzandknives.com” for more info.
I stopped breathing.
I don’t mean that in a hyperbolic way. I’m not prone to panic attacks, or anything like that, but I literally stopped breathing. My breath was gone as I listened to that 15 second ad, and when it came back, it was in short staccato bursts. My pulse was high, and I had to focus on getting my breathing back to normal so I wouldn’t pass out, right there in the parking lot.
Who would do this, I thought. So soon after the tragedy, so fresh in people’s minds—a gun show? Do we really need another gun show? The glorification of the guns I heard in that 15 seconds…well, like I said, it took my breath away. And I wondered, after all of this, how a person justifies walking into a gun show and says it’s okay, that he is making the world safer for our kids.
I read another statistic the other day that the number of households in America that have a gun is actually declining. It’s something around 23%, which isn’t really very high at all. But the number of gun sales are still high, increasing, actually, since 2010. I don’t know if this statistic is true. I’m skeptical of media outlets and news sites, and I’m skeptical of statistics in general. But if that is all true, it means that the people who are buying guns are the people who already have them. They are building up arsenals of weapons.
This doesn’t make sense to me at all.
I’m trying to be fair minded and not crazy about this. I’m trying to wrap my brain around the arguments, the reasons people have, trying to give everybody the benefit of the doubt, trying to keep a cool head because I’d like to see some effective action take place, and effective action takes rational debate.
But I read the NRA’s statement, and while I agree with the problems of glorifying death and killing in our entertainment, the idea of putting guns in our schools makes me recoil. Arming our mild mannered principal? Having a gun in every Kindergarten class? I read somewhere else that having armed security makes children *more* fearful, not less. Is this really what our society has come to? NRA, that’s the BEST you can do? MORE guns is the answer?
I don’t think it is. To my core, I don’t think it is. And I don’t think the country is buying it, either.
It must be hard to be a gun owner these days.




I am a Democrat and I love this post and admire you for posting it. Amen.
Comment #1 by StephDecember 22nd, 2012 at 9:07 amMaybe the Trolley Sq shooting was stopped with another gun, but think of the Aurora shooting, in a movie theater! It was dark and even if you had a gun it wasn’t clear who was shooting it.
Even if we want to arm the schools, even if the principals have one in their office, if they want to be truly, truly, effective, they would have to carry it around with them everywhere, even in the classrooms while they are visiting kids. And that just doesn’t seem like a winning situation, training and arming principals rather than limiting sales of semiautomatic guns (clearly not hunting weapons).
Thanks for the post. Sorry for your tough year as a Republican!
Comment #2 by EleanorDecember 22nd, 2012 at 11:01 amThere is no guarantee that banning guns will decrease violence. Look at Australia where “assault” weapons are banned and the rest must be locked up. Wikipedia summarizes the debate:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_politics_in_Australia#Contention_over_effects_of_the_laws
Our borders are insecure and our own government gave military grade weapons to cartels across the border (google “Fast and Furious.”) Those same guns unsurprisingly made it back into the US. These people in our government are the same people who want to ban these guns. Huh?!?
There is no legal definition of an “assault rifle”. A good example of this is the banned AR15 and its identical counterpart. The AR15 has a bayonet mount and flash suppressor. They both have the same fire rate, clip size, and caliber.
Note that “a 2001 Justice Department study revealed that fewer than 2% of State and Federal inmates used, carried, or possessed a military-style semi-automatic gun or a fully automatic gun during their current offense.”
Guns are not cause. Mass shootings have many commonalities, besides a gun. Mental illness, anti-psychotic drugs, being male, etc. How are we not addressing this?
One last deep thought: When seconds count, the police are minutes away.
Comment #3 by GDTDecember 22nd, 2012 at 2:59 pmI have previously always been for gun rights, while not caring for guns for myself. However, I have been wondering lately if I trust these “people with guns” as my neighborhood has been trying to fight our city council from putting a gun range a little over a mile from my neighborhood and THREE schools (two built, and one to be built for the upcoming school year). In so many ways it make absolutely NO SENSE. However, the illogical arguments from the “pro-gun” populace has been overwhelming, and quite honestly a bit frightening. Are these people really willing to put a recreational activity over children’s safety and others quality of life? Yep. www.changetherange.com
Comment #4 by KDecember 22nd, 2012 at 5:48 pmI think it’s been a bad year politically period. I have no idea how some of our elected officials are at the positions they are. Crazy cooks, some of them are.
I myself have always been for gun rights, though I do not own a gun myself. In the aftermath of the Connecticut shooting, my thoughts wandered to the fear of the teachers who had been somewhat warned through the choas unfolding on the PA system; possibly standing in front of their 20 something children knowing that the only thing that stood between them and the crazed gunman in the halls was a locked door. How helpless you would feel! If you had a gun in your hand as well, I’m sure it would bring some faith in your ability to protect yourself and the children placed in your charge and your care.
However, I am unsure how I feel about all teachers carrying weapons in school. I myself am a 5 ft. 7 in, 120 pound woman who-truth be told-am weak sauce. I could be overtaken easily by someone bigger/stronger/faster than me in a heartbeat and what happens when the gun (MY gun) intended for good is now in the bad guys hands? I think, if I were a teacher who lived in a stated where concealed carry was legal in schools (in my state it is) I would keep a gun in a locked drawer of my desk in a combinational lock. Maybe others would prefer to carry, maybe others would prefer to not have one at all, but I would prefer to have my right to choose.
But the simply truth is, this isn’t a one-solution problem is it? It seems in most conversations I’ve been in and listened to–whether for or against tighter gun control–the party seems to suggest that their way is *the* way to fix this problem. It’s isn’t. And that right there is what is so dang hard about this situation we are in.
Comment #5 by HaybayDecember 22nd, 2012 at 6:27 pmThe NRA statement made me think of Alma. The only way to stop bad people with guns is not more guns:
“And now, as the preaching of the word had a great tendency to lead the people to do that which was just—yea, it had had more powerful effect upon the minds of the people than the sword, or anything else, which had happened unto them—therefore Alma thought it was expedient that they should try the virtue of the word of God”
Isn’t it amazing that the gun companies, who control the NRA, would make tons of money if we suddenly had to arm all of our school teachers?
I too am a registered Republican, but this last year has made me hang my head in shame. I honestly don’t want to identify with all the stupid rape comments made by Republicans. I’m not far right enough for Tea Party, so I think I’m officially going to leave the party and be independent.
Comment #6 by EmilyDecember 22nd, 2012 at 11:25 pmOh, and I forgot, I was going to add one more thing. You are right that people with guns are buying more, rather than more people becoming gun owners. During Regional Conference in Utah Valley, Elder Oaks had to speak out against joining militias against the government and against stockpiling weapons. I have relatives that have a stockpile of semi-automatic weapons to guard their food storage. Of course, these same relatives are starting to get old and their minds are starting to slip. That scares me WAY more than marauding hoards looking for my wheat. I’m afraid they’re going to shoot a neighbor kid playing night-games one night.
Comment #7 by EmilyDecember 22nd, 2012 at 11:31 pmI’m a Democrat. Sometimes I hang my head in shame at my party. I don’t have any confident answers in the gun debate, but I tend agree with you. And I really like this post.
Comment #8 by Jen GDecember 23rd, 2012 at 3:04 pmI’m a Democrat. Sometimes I hang my head in shame at my party. I don’t have any confident answers in the gun debate, but I tend agree with you. And I really like this post.
Comment #9 by Jen GDecember 23rd, 2012 at 3:04 pmThe NRA guy (I won’t justify saying his name) said today on Meet the Press that “new gun laws won’t work.” I’m tired of hearing that nothing will work with regards to “gun control.” Isn’t it worth at least one gun related fatality to at least try?? Or 20? We limit how fast we can drive, what we can yell in a movie theatre, how we can transport our children in a car, how much alcohol one can consume and still drive, cigarette advertising — why on earth are GUNS off limits??? It makes no sense to me. But I’m a democrat. Have had long standing beliefs on gun control. We are not gun owners — nor were our ancestors. My dad played football. No guns required.
Comment #10 by Melissa McDecember 23rd, 2012 at 4:18 pmJust don’t unfriend me.
I used to teach school and I KNOW that even if I were issued a gun and taught how to shoot it, I could never pull that trigger. In fact, there have been a lot of studies done about soldiers who have admitted to having never pulled the trigger in battle. My husband’s grandpa admits that in WWII he never did actually shoot at another person, and that’s even after watching his twin die right before his eyes. So while someone wielding a gun would definitely look threatening, if teachers were ever in a situation like at Sandy Hook where they felt the only way to stop the guy is to shoot him, I wonder how many of them could. There really is no clear right answer and the whole situation just makes me sad.
Comment #11 by StarababaDecember 23rd, 2012 at 10:08 pmThe thing that bugs me about this is that last weekend there were 2 shootings that were stopped by people carrrying concealed weapons (with permits). One was in Texas. The other was in Oregon. Both times the shooter took out their weapon and killed one or two people before the concealed weapon guy busted out their weapon & killed the shooter. And then stuck around to answer questions when the police arrived.
Were either of these incidents on the news, given public Thank You’s to the concealed weapon-carrying Good Samaritan, or publicized to show that there are conscious-driven good people out there who are Pro Gun?
No.
Comment #12 by AmyDecember 24th, 2012 at 9:53 amPS. Texas just passed a law allowing teachers to carry guns. Sometimes I love Texas, just for their principles. Ha!
(and I get what you were saying about republicans. That is why I’m libertarian now. As far as I’m concerned, both parties are completely corrupt.)
Comment #13 by AmyDecember 24th, 2012 at 9:54 amPPS. I wrote a post about this after the CT tragedy. Read my thoughts.
I really do think that the issue here is mental health & family values….notice how neither of those topics are hot on the news right now? By focusing on guns, we’re treating symptoms, not causes. Its like putting salve & band-aids on the plague boils instead of vaccinating to eradicate it.
Comment #14 by AmyDecember 24th, 2012 at 10:04 amI don’t have any guns, nor do I plan on ever having any. But a couple close family members have quite a few guns. They don’t hunt, the guns are solely used at the gun range or for target practice. It is a hobby, which they thoroughly enjoy, and they have fun trying out different kinds of guns. I was recently asking them about it, trying both to get to know them better and to learn a little about guns, since I knew practically nothing about them before. I found it interesting how defensive they were at first, even though I was offering no criticism or condemnation. I guess a lot of their friends have been extremely upset and judgmental lately because they own guns. My husband owns swords, swordfighting is a hobby of his, and so I guess I am used to the idea of hobby weapons (though, of course, swords are not as deadly as guns). But I think all the hatred and vitriol being spread around against gun owners is ridiculous. I also think the stigma about having mental health issues is ridiculous. I know so many people that suffer from anxiety or depression, but are ashamed to tell anyone, or are ashamed to have a prescription, and don’t end up taking their medication because that would mean they were “admitting” they were “broken” and needed help. I think, if there were not so much shame involved in seeking help for mental illness, that it would help a lot with those suffering from it to seek the help they need (cost and availability of mental health care are other issues that deserve their own long discussion).
I have several friends whose husbands hunt, and I have friends who have guns for the express purpose of defending their food storage in the event of the apocalypse. I have a hard time agreeing with or understanding the reasonings of the food storage defenders, and I don’t understand the thrill of hunting, but they are all good people. I don’t have a good understanding of current gun laws or the pros and cons of gun law reform. I have no problem with people carefully evaluating them and with thoughtful well-considered changes to them. I’m just concerned about the possibility of emotionally-charged reactionary changes, I guess. I’ve had enough of the “I’m right and you’re wrong and must be a sinner to boot” mentality that has proven so divisive this year, in the election, around the pants issue, and now about guns. There are not a simple two sides to every issue, life is complicated and messy, blah blah etc. etc. I just wish people would take a moment to step back and calmly consider opposing positions and ideals. It’s so much easier to have thoughtful debates and discussions when both parties are willing to step back, take a breath, and regroup when things start getting heated, instead of starting to paint everyone else with broad negative brush strokes.
I always enjoy coming here to read things. It’s like a breath of fresh air after all the hatred and hate-mongering spread around other sites. Thank you for being thoughtful and considerate.
Comment #15 by kaduseyDecember 25th, 2012 at 6:36 amI am a Republican and had a tough year too. I also had the same gut reaction after Newton: Geez, we have to do something, how ’bout less guns? I don’t hunt or own a gun and have no plans to do so.
Guns in schools seems crazy. But Sidwell Friends School, where the Obama daughters attend, has 11 armed guards. This is not the secret service we’re talking about. I mean the school itself. Do you think there would ever *EVER* be a shooting massacre at Sidwell? So what is the craziest thing here? More gun or less?
I’ve also heard some crazy numbers that seem to show that our gun violence isn’t so high when you back out gang violence offenses. I really want us as a country to be more willing to be honest about who is using guns and how. I feel like both sides are skewing the numbers to push their political football down the field.
I just don’t know what to think anymore.
Comment #16 by GreenDavisDecember 25th, 2012 at 11:30 amPlease read carefully the statement by the NRA. They are asking for armed and trained guards at the school and are willing to provide the training. They are not asking educators to be shooters. As comment #16 pointed out private school already have armed guards and most public schools have a security officer . These security personal could receive additional training allowing them to safely handled a gun. It would make their job safer for them and the entire school. As for teachers or other staff carrying guns I have been in the education field too long to feel safe with guns being available in the general classroom area. of course there are knives, scissors, and other shape and pointy objects in every school that can be used as weapons. There are also mentally unstable people, some students, at every school too. I would rather see the issue of mental health being the focus including the safety of the other student when mentally unstable children must be included in the student body.
Comment #17 by jennifer ruebenDecember 26th, 2012 at 12:41 amSidwell Friends has armed guards? Cause the Quakers are all about pacifism. Interesting.
Comment #18 by LisaCDecember 28th, 2012 at 2:57 amHello, I am an Australian. A previous Prime Minister of ours, John Howard, reacted to a terrible mass shooting here (35 dead) by implementing gun control and by buying back weapons. It wasn’t popular with his core constituency, but it was the best thing he ever did. Sure, we still have a fair few idiots with illegal guns, but they mostly shoot each other. The average criminal is not interested in killing innocent bystanders, let alone kindergarteners. It’s the mentally ill we need to worry about and without proper controls we cannot keep the guns out of their hands. Best wishes to you all as you try to change your culture on this issue, it will not be easy but you must do it.
Comment #19 by Calico gingerJanuary 12th, 2013 at 12:11 am